Legal Opinion

Moroney v. Allman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 21, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

May 2, 1933, complainant filed his verified hill against James P. Allman, commissioner of police of Chicago, and other city officials, to restrain them from molesting, annoying or interfering with complainant in the operation of his business in the City of Chicago. The defendants filed their appearance, and it seems to be conceded that they were represented when complainant’s motion came on for hearing before the chancellor ; an order was entered as prayed for in the bill, defendants being restrained “until the further order of this court. ’ ’ And it is to reverse this interlocutory order…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Freer v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People ex rel. Morrison v. CregierIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Zanone v. Mound CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wood v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1852

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kurtzworth v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. D. Gottlieb & Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Landstrom v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  4. People ex rel. Moroney v. AllmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API