Legal Opinion

D. Gottlieb & Co. v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 21, 1951No. Gen. 45,188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Upon plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite as prayed in its verified complaint as amended and supplemented, the following order was «entered by the trial court:

“1. That the defendants . . . and their successors in office and their servants, agents, and attorneys, and all police officers of the City of Chicago be and each of them hereby is enjoined and restrained from seizing, confiscating, destroying or otherwise interfering with the operation, keeping, or use of the Bowlette machine manufactured by D. Gottlieb & Co., plaintiff herein, in any place of public resort in the City of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Morrison v. CregierIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fletcher v. TuttleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rosehill Cemetery Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. McWeeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. King v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koziol v. Village of RosemontAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. People Ex Rel. Carter v. HurleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Coven Distributing Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API