Wood v. City of Brooklyn
New York Supreme Court
In Equity. This was a motion to continue a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from enforcing an ordinance of the common council of the city of Brooklyn, The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtS. B. Strong, J.
I have refrained from deciding the motion to continue the preliminary injunction in this cause until now, in the hope that the common council of the city of Brooklyn would, by an amendment of their ordinance, which I suggested on the argument, render any further restriction upon its operation unnecessary. But no such amendment has been made, and the plaintiff calls upon me, as he has a right to do, to pronounce a decision without further delay.
The grounds of the motion which I deem it necessary to consider are,- that the ordinance is void, and that its enforcement inflicts upon the plaintiff…
2Cited by33 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Poyer v. Village of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.