Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Hendry
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided May 11, 1999No. Civil Action 6:99-0253PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion of the defendant to dismiss this case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), (2), (4), and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The memorandum accompanying the motion addresses only' the Rule 12(b)(5) justification — dismissal based upon insufficiency of service of process. The Court’s clerk, with notice to the defendant, contacted the plaintiffs counsel to remind him of his obligation to respond to the motion, yet the plaintiff failed to respond. Rather, plaintiffs counsel mailed to the Court many days…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Koehler v. DodwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Jean L. Richards v. Hal Harper, Max Baucus, and Pat WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Syncrude Canada Ltd. v. Highland Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Lidas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation David Chelala Liliane Chelala v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Davies v. Jobs & Adverts Online, GmbhDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- G.G.G. Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.