Legal Opinion
Jean L. Richards v. Hal Harper, Max Baucus, and Pat Williams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1988No. 87-4225PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Jean Richards, appealing pro se, challenges the exercise of removal jurisdiction, the refusal to appoint counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1982), summary judgment in favor of two defendants and dismissal in favor of a third.
FACTS
Richards alleges that United States Senator Baucus, United States Representative Pat Williams, and Montana State Representative Hal Harper violated her civil rights through “obstruction of justice, defamation, harassment, misuse of public record, retaliation with government services, improper and illegal practices, and political…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Steven M. Desrosiers v. John J. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Barry v. RatelleDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997
- In Re Mattel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.