Watertown Concrete Products, Inc. v. Foster
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This is a creditor’s action against an estate. Probate proceedings were commenced before the effective date of the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), but this action was brought after the code's effective date. The question is which law applies. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the plain language of SDCL 29A-8-101 requires that this action be governed by the UPC.
A
[¶ 2.] Ramsey Marlowe Foster died on August 6, 1993. His sons, Thomas and Rodney Foster, were appointed co-executors. In August 1995, while probate proceedings were still open, Rodney placed an order for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. St. CloudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Canyon Lake Park, L.L.C. v. Loftus Dental, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hayes v. Rosenbaum Signs & Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Wilcox v. VERMEULENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Wyman v. BrucknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.