Legal Opinion
State v. St. Cloud
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1991No. 16966PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
St. Cloud was convicted in state court of rape and kidnapping. He appeals his conviction, claiming lack of jurisdiction, faulty jury instruction and insufficient evidence. We affirm.
Facts
St. Cloud is a resident of the Lower Brule Sioux Indian Reservation who participated in the tribe’s alcoholic treatment program. On April 16, 1986, he appeared in a disheveled state at the tribe’s alcoholic treatment center in Lower Brule village and met with a counselor he knew there. The counselor, a non-Indian woman, offered him a ride to his friend’s nearby house because she did not want…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. StoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Canyon Lake Park, L.L.C. v. Loftus Dental, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.