Legal Opinion
Garnett v. ADT LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 6, 2015No. CIV. NO. 2:14-02851 WBS DADPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Shirley Garnett brought this putative class action against defendant ADT LLC, asserting claims arising out -of the' alleged failure to reimburse her and others for work-related expenses and failure to provide accurate wage statements required by California law. Defendant removed the action from San-Joaquin County Superior Court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005.- 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1446. ■ Pursuant to . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Culley v. Lincare Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Cabardo v. PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Troester v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Brown v. Dave & Buster's of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.