Legal Opinion

McCanless v. . Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In a processioning proceeding under C. S., 361-364, to establish the boundary line between adjoining landowners, which is applicable only in case of a dispute as to its true location, Wood v. Hughes, 195 N. C., 185, 141 S. E., 569, the plaintiff is the actor and has the burden of establishing the true location of the dividing line. Garris v. Harrington, 167 N. C., 86, 83 S. E., 253; Hill v. Dalton, 140 N. C., 9, 52 S. E., 425; Woody v. Fountain, 143 N. C., 66, 55 S. E., 425.

Here the court properly instructed the jury that the plaintiffs had the laboring oar in establishing the true dividing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
  2. Hill v. Dalton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Woody v. Fountain.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Pruden v. KeemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Blair v. FairchildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API