Legal Opinion

(PC) Keck v. Batra

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 2, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00910Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILL KECK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00910-JDP 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 13 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 14 S. BATRA, ECF No. 1 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Bill Keck is a civil detainee proceeding without counsel and without prepayment 18 of fees in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF 19 No. 1, is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). I have screened plaintiff’s 20 complaint and find that it contains insufficient detail to state…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API