Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Wilder

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1900No. 1,341PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

A motion is made in this case by the Eirst National Bank of Denver, the plaintiff in error, “for a rule or order permitting it to file a supplemental bill of exceptions” to bring to the attention of this court an alleged occurrence at the trial of the cause of which no mention is made in the bill of exceptions contained in the record now on Ale in this court. The motion is accompanied by several affidavits, which purport to set out certain remarks of the attorney for the defendant in error in his argument of the case to the jury in the circuit court. Whether the motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Case v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Rollins v. Board of Com'rs of Gunnison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Honey v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. Johnson v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Pemberton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API