Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Titanium Pigment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1936No. 10303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law brought by the appellant, as plaintiff, against the appellee, as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the defendant’s negligence. The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was granted, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and, from the judgment, the plaintiff has appealed.

The only error properly assigned and the only assignment of error argued is that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. This…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Denver Live Stock Commission Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morsman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Morsman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API