Honey v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of tlie United States for tbe Southern District of Iowa. This was an action at law by W. O. B. Honey against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Bailroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries. The circuit court directed a verdict for defendant, and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff brought the case to this court on error.
1Opinion of the Court
BREWER, Circuit Justice.
These two cases — 831 and 959 — grew out of a single action at law brought by W. O. B. Honey to recover damages for personal injuries. On the trial in the circuit court, the jury, on March 30, 1895, under the instructions of the court, returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, upon which verdict a judgment was duly entered. Time was given for the preparation of a bill of exceptions, which was extended by several stipulations of the parties to June 1, 1896. Before that date the bill was properly settled, signed, and filed. It was regular in form, and complete in all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Oswego Township v. Travelers' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Taylor-Craig Corp. v. HageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- First Nat. Bank of Denver v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Van Why v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
- Pemberton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935