Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 24, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00371Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 BARRY JAMES CHRISTENSEN II, Case No. 3:24-CV-00371-ART-CLB 7 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION 8 TO COMPEL ARBITRATION FINDLAY ARN, LLC d/b/a AUDI RENO AND STAY PROCEEDINGS 9 TAHOE, FINDLAY AUTOMOTIVE INC., (ECF No.11) AND JUSTIN FINDLAY, 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff Barry Christensen II brings this action pro se against his former 13 employer (“Audi”), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, NRS 14 608.100, NRS 613.120, the Family Medical Leave Act, and the Nevada Deceptive 15 Trade Practices Act, as well as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Florer v. Congregation Pidyon Shevuyim, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.