Legal Opinion
Broadnax v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00113Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Rafford Broadnax, Case No. 2:25-cv-00113-JAD-MDC 5 Plaintiff v. Order Denying Motion to Remand, 6 Granting Motion to Compel Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Arbitration, and Staying Case Pending 7 Arbitration Defendants 8 ECF Nos. 5, 6, 9, 18, 23, 34, 35, 45, 49, 50 9 10 Rafford Broadnax is a former Uber driver who characterizes himself as “the 11 epitome of diligence and compliance in the rideshare industry, having meticulously 12 adhered to all state and local regulations required” to do his job.1 Broadnax was 13 “deactivated” as a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.