Legal Opinion
Spirco, Inc. v. Copelin (In Re Spirco, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 1996No. 19-10145PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Chief Judge.
Debtor Spirco, Inc. has moved for an order enforcing the provision of its confirmed plan of reorganization which prohibits respondent Wayne Copelin from continuing his efforts in another forum to collect from Innovo Group, Inc. on a pre-petition debt owed by debtor and guaranteed by Innovo. It also requests that we hold Copelin in contempt of court and impose an appropriate sanction upon him.
Copelin steadfastly denies for a variety of reasons that we may or should grant the relief debtor has requested.
For reasons set forth below, we will…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wayne Copelin v. Spirco, Inc., F/k/a Nasco Inc., Stephen I. Goldring, Trustee Innovo Group, Inc.,(pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States Trustee v. Craige (In Re Salina Speedway, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Muralo Co. v. All Listed on Exhibits a Through D to Complaint (In Re Muralo Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- American Freight System, Inc. v. Powell (In Re American Freight System, Inc.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Spirco, Inc. v. Copelin (In Re Spirco, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.