Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Fox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 577Published

1ConcurrenceParker, J.

Defendants in their brief state two questions are involved:

“1. Is the ordinance, as applied in the instant case, an unconstitutional interference with the defendants’ rights to freedom of *197speech and peaceable assembly protected against State infringement under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 17, of the North Carolina State Constitution?
“2. Is the ordinance, as applied in the instant case, unconstitutionally vague in that it does not apprise these defendants nor the public generally of the offense prohibited by it?”

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Poulos v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API