Poulos v. New Hampshire
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
This appeal presents the validity of a conviction of appellant for conducting religious services in a public park of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, without a required license, when proper application for the license had been arbitrarily and unreasonably refused by the City Council. The conclusion depends upon consideration of the prin*397ciples of the First Amendment secured against state abridgment by the Fourteenth.1
Appellant is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Permission for appellant and another Witness, now deceased, was sought to conduct services in Goodwin Park on June 25 and July 2. They offered…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by339 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.