Legal Opinion

Tuebner v. Cal. St. R.R.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1884No. 8,191PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

-The action was brought to abate an alleged nuisance, and to recover damages. The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiffs for $1,000 damages; and from the judgment rendered therefor, and an order denying a new trial, the defendant appealed.

*172The case is, in substance, as follows: The plaintiffs, owners of a lot of land near the corner of Larkin and California streets, in the city and county of San Francisco, had thereon two dwelling-houses (one occupied by the family of one of the plaintiffs, the other by the family of the other plaintiff), and on the rear of the lot a two-story building, in the…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Anderson v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Holman v. Athens Empire Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Sullivan v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API