Legal Opinion

Porter, Exr. v. Lerch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24804PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

An unusually full statement of this ease has been deemed advisable for a better understanding of the somewhat complicated matters presented for decision.

The first question of major importance is whether this action abated with the death of John E. Lerch. Section 11397, General Code, recites:

“Unless otherwise provided, no action or proceeding pending in any court shall abate by the death of either or both of the parties thereto, except actions for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, for a nuisance, or against a justice of the peace for misconduct in office, which shall abale by the death of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Lewis v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Dennis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Herbert v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PorelloOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. In Re PetitionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Walter v. Alliedsignal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API