Legal Opinion

Stevens v. City of Logansport

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7929PublishedCited by 36 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Action by the appellant to review a judgment. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, for the want of facts, and, the appellant declining to amend, gave judgment for the appellee.

The complaint in the original action charged, in substance and with sufficient particularity, that the appellant, who was a resident and practicing physician and surgeon in said city of Logansport, while going to visit a patient, without fault of his own, had fallen into a deep and dangerous ditch, drain or gutter, which, with due notice, the appellee had negli.gently pennitted to be and remain in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Owen v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Davis v. PerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. McDade v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Hardy v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Louthain v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API