State v. Dahl
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The primary question that this case presents is whether the state may rely on a statutory presumption to prove a traffic violation. We hold, as did the trial court and the Court of Appeals, that it may do so and accordingly affirm the Court of Appeals decision and the trial court’s judgment.
A Portland police officer using “photo radar” 1 determined that a car registered to defendant had exceeded the speed limit. Although the photo radar took a photograph of the car and its driver, the officer did not stop the car or otherwise determine the driver’s identity. Pursuant to ORS 810.439(1), 2 the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Bobo v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Damon v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.