Legal Opinion

Christie v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1982No. SC 28309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners challenge a ballot title prepared for respondent Secretary of State by the Attorney General. Upon a petition stating that a proposed ballot title is “insufficient or unfair,” ORS 250.085, this court must review the title and certify to the Secretary of State a title “which meets the requirements of ORS 250.035.” That section provides:

“(1) The ballot title of any measure to be initiated or referred shall consist of:
“(a) A caption of not more than 10 words by which the measure is commonly referred to;
“(b) A question of not more than 20 words which plainly states the purpose of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernard v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Oregon Taxpayers Union v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mitchell v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Phipps v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Miller v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API