Legal Opinion

Miller v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1982No. SC 28420, SC 28445Published

1Per curiam

Petitioners Miller and Bowlby requested this court to review a ballot title certified by the Attorney General. The title was for a proposed initiative measure relating to self-service gasoline pumps.

Miller contends that part of the title, entitled “Explanation,” is “insufficient.” ORS 250.085(1).1 Miller does not challenge the caption or the “Question” of the certified title. In response to Miller’s petition, the Attorney General submitted an amended “Explanation” which remedies one deficiency alleged by Miller.

The amended title submitted by the Attorney General is:

“PERMITS SELF-SERVICE…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zajonc v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Christie v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Zajonc v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API