Dodd v. Moore
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
It is contended by appellant that the complaint of the appellee is bad on demurrer, for the reason that it avers that she sues by next friend, but does not show that she was not of full age when the action was instituted; but this contention can not prevail. In the case of Lancaster v. *398Gould, 46 Ind. 397, it was said: “ It is not alleged that the plaintiffs for whom Blair acted as next friend were infants; but this would hardly be ground for demurrer.” Dodd v. Moore, 91 Ind. 522.
Filed Jan. 2, 1884.
It is the settled law of this State that in cases where a witness is contradicted by evidence of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
- Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
- Dodd v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Dailey v. State ex rel. CourtneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Brookbank v. State ex rel. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. MaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Rhea v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.