Legal Opinion
Al-Kurdi v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 31, 1992No. 90-29CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This government contract case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff maintains that defendant breached an implied contract. Defendant counters that the alleged contract is unenforceable.
Factual Background
Plaintiff, Fayyad Al-Kurdi, a Jordanian real estate agent,1 alleges that in 1984 he entered into an oral agreement with officials from the United States Embassy (Embassy) in Jordan to locate property for a new Embassy Chancery. Plaintiff avers that the United States agreed to compensate plaintiff, indirectly through a fee from the seller,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- First Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Kamaya Co. v. American Property Consultants, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Hauschild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.