Kamaya Co. v. American Property Consultants, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, C.J.
— Plaintiffs—a group of passive investors in a Japanese real estate partnership—appeal the trial court’s order compelling them to arbitrate their fraud-in-the-inducement of the partnership agreement claims with American Property Consultants, Ltd., and its officers and directors (the APC Defendants). Plaintiffs contend that their fraud-in-the-inducement claims are not arbitrable under the partnership agreement’s arbitration clause because the partnership agreement contains a Japanese choice-of-law provision. And—according to Plaintiffs— under Japanese law, general arbitration clauses do not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.