Legal Opinion

Kamaya Co. v. American Property Consultants, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 27, 1998No. 40801-1-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, C.J.

— Plaintiffs—a group of passive investors in a Japanese real estate partnership—appeal the trial court’s order compelling them to arbitrate their fraud-in-the-inducement of the partnership agreement claims with American Property Consultants, Ltd., and its officers and directors (the APC Defendants). Plaintiffs contend that their fraud-in-the-inducement claims are not arbitrable under the partnership agreement’s arbitration clause because the partnership agreement contains a Japanese choice-of-law provision. And—according to Plaintiffs— under Japanese law, general arbitration clauses do not…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API