Legal Opinion
Crane Co. v. Aeroquip Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 18, 1973No. 72 C 1403, 72 C 2755PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DECKER, District Judge.
These consolidated breach of contract and patent infringement actions arose out of a dispute between the owner of United States Letters Patent No. 2,-933,333 (“the suit patent”), plaintiff, Crane Co., and the exclusive licensee under said patent, defendant, Aeroquip Corporation. Most of the relevant back ground facts are set forth in this court’s memorandum opinion of March 13, 1973, which is reported in 356 F.Supp. 733, D.C. At that time plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment as to royalties and termination of the license agreement and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Crane Company v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Raymond Boyd v. Schildkraut Giftware Corporation and D & E Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.