Legal Opinion

Ray v. Consolidated Freightways

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1955No. 8352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Two modern road behemoths, plaintiff’s oil tanker truck and defendant’s large tractor trailer, unfortunately needed the use of the same space at the same time on a highway narrowed by heavily drifted snow. To avoid a collision, plaintiff’s tanker “took for timber” off the road and ran into a utility tower. • That circumstance provided the foundation for this and another law suit hereinafter referred to.

The incident happened on February 14, about 6 a. m. while it was still dark. Ray’s oil tanker, containing a full load of gasoline, was traveling westward on U. S. Highway 91…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Vaughn's Adm'r v. Louisville N. R. Co., Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Pearlman v. TruppoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  5. Lawrence v. Bamberger Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Creighton v. RuarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API