Legal Opinion

Pearlman v. Truppo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 1, 1932PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackerson, S. C. C.

This action is to recover damages resulting from a collision between the automobile of the plaintiff Morris Pearlman and that of the defendant, Frank Truppo. A discontinuance has been entered as to all the plaintiffs except Pearlman. The defendant, Truppo, now moves for leave to file an amended answer so as to include a fifth separate defense of res adjudícala arising out of the circumstance that one, Helen Lerman, a passenger injured in Pearlman’s car at the time of the collision, having heretofore sued both Lerman and Truppo as co-defendants, recovered a judgment against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Snyder v. MarkenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Westfield Gas & Milling Co. v. Noblesville & Eagletown Gravel Road Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Erie Railroad v. BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Self v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomlinson-Arkwright Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Desmond v. KramerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API