Legal Opinion

Howry v. Eppinger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J:

Eppinger and Lehman brought action to recover the amount due upon a promissory note signed by the defendants Wiggins, and made payable to the order of defendant Howry. There were three other actions commenced by the same plaintiffs against the same defendants, upon similar notes given at the same time, except that one was signed by Howry and made payable to the order of defendants Wiggins. In all other respects the facts in each case were alike; they were therefore, under a stipulation between counsel, argued and submitted as one case.

These notes were secured by mortgage, and on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Kelley v. WhitneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. W. W. Kimball Co. v. MellonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fox v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Farrell v. LovettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API