Legal Opinion

Tannahill v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1922No. Civ. No. 3928Published

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an original* application to this court for a writ of mandate to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions. An alternative writ of mandate was issued—inadvertently, as it now appears. In due time respondents appeared and presented a general demurrer to the petition. Thereafter the briefs were filed, and the matter has been regularly submitted. Because we think the proceeding is not properly here, we refrain from expressing any opinion upon the merits of the controversy or upon the propriety of the issuance of the writ of mandate by the proper court.

Though contending that the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Favorite v. Superior Court of Riverside Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Collins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Davidson v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Matter of Application of DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stewart v. TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API