Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Graham

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1914No. Civ. No. 1262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to be' directed to the Clerk of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate commanding defendant to enter the default of A. T. Karry in a certain action wherein Mattie E. Davidson is plaintiff and Samuel Hinckley and A. T. Karry are defendants, now pending in the superior court of San Joaquin County.

It appears from the amended petition that the action above referred to was commenced to recover judgment upon a bond, in which Hinckley and Karry were sureties, to stay execution in a certain action entitled Emanuel Gjurich, Plaintiff, v. Fanny Fieg, Defendant, pending in the superior court of San Joaquin County. Petitioner is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hestres v. ClementsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Minehan v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Goland v. Peter Nolan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Tannahill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API