Stewart v. Torrance
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for mandamus to compel the judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County to settle a bill of exceptions. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Mandamus to compel settlement of a bill of exceptions.
Petitioner filed an action for a divorce in the superior court for San Diego county, against Elmore Stewart, who answered the complaint and filed a cross-complaint for divorce against petitioner. Respondent, as judge of said court, tried the cause, and on June 4, 1908, rendered judgment in favor of the defendant on his cross-complaint. Notice of decision was served June 5,1908, and on June 13, 1908, petitioner gave notice of her intention to move for a new trial. An order extending time was made by respondent at the request of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Moultrie v. TarpioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Application of DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Tannahill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922