MacK v. Decker

Appellants make these contentions on this appeal:(1) There is no credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that defendant Taft was causally negligent in stopping his automobile on a public highway.(2) If this court finds that there is credible evidence to support such finding, a new trial must be had because of prejudicial error.

The second contention is predicated on the refusal of the trial court to admit into evidence a written statement subscribed by plaintiff Patricia Mack, and on the instructions to the jury.

Jury Issue With Respect to Taft’s Alleged Negligence.

A determination of…