St. Clair v. McDonnell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The issue on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence which supports the jury’s finding that plaintiff was causally negligent. In order to resolve this issue it is necessary to set forth a résumé of the material evidence. Surprisingly, there is no substantial conflict in the testimony of plaintiff and defendant. No witnesses other than the two parties testified with respect to how the accident occurred.
The accident happened during the noon hour on Jack-r son street in Janesville on a clear December day, but the street was slushy and slippery at least in places. Jackson street…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reuhl v. UszlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Thoresen v. GrythingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Tesch v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Verbeten v. HuettlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Jeffers v. Peoria-Rockford Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Diener v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Johnson v. McDermottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.