Legal Opinion

Sol Shearn Rovinsky v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1984No. 82-1577PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

Without advancing any reasons for doing so, a state court conducting a criminal trial held a hearing in chambers on the state’s motion to restrict the cross-examination of a prosecution witness despite the defendant’s objection to the procedure as violating *199his right to a public trial, imminent in the process due him under the fourteenth amendment. Following the defendant’s conviction, a federal district court denied him a writ of habeas corpus. Reversing the district court, we hold that the right to a public trial specifically guaranteed by the sixth amendment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. United States v. James Ted Norris, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re ThomaTexas Supreme Court · 1994

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API