Sol Shearn Rovinsky v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Without advancing any reasons for doing so, a state court conducting a criminal trial held a hearing in chambers on the state’s motion to restrict the cross-examination of a prosecution witness despite the defendant’s objection to the procedure as violating *199his right to a public trial, imminent in the process due him under the fourteenth amendment. Following the defendant’s conviction, a federal district court denied him a writ of habeas corpus. Reversing the district court, we hold that the right to a public trial specifically guaranteed by the sixth amendment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. James Ted Norris, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re ThomaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.