Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2014No. 85809-8PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*511¶1 This case presents the issue of whether sidebar conferences implicate a criminal defendant’s right to a public trial under article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution and require a conviction to be overturned. William Glen Smith claims that the trial court violated his public trial right when courtroom limitations led to holding sidebar conferences in a hallway outside the courtroom on the record with counsel present. Smith argues that these sidebars were courtroom closures subject to State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 906 P.2d 325 (1995). Because the trial court did not perform a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. LoveWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. MoralesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API