Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull Metals

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 17, 1993No. 1920610PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company ("Goodyear") appeals from a dismissal of an action of indemnity; the trial court held the action was barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-53, Ala. Code 1975, and dismissed it pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P.

In reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, this Court must examine the allegations in the pleadings and construe them so as to resolve all doubts concerning the sufficiency of the complaint in favor of the plaintiff, to determine whether the plaintiff can prove "any set of facts in support of his…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Enserch Corp. v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southeast v. TrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v. COMPOSITE CONSTR. SYSTEMS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Holcim (US), Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API