Catherine Ulissey, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. Alexander Shvartsman, Defendant-Appellant/cross
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal questions whether the district court properly granted summary judgment. Concluding there are material facts in controversy, we reverse.
I
Invoking diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff Catherine Ulissey sued Alexander Shvarts-man, alleging he negligently collided with her while they were skiing on Snowmass Mountain at Aspen, Colorado. Ms. Ulissey claimed, as the uphill skier, Mr. Shvartsman failed to maintain a proper lookout, breaching statutory duties imposed by the Colorado Ski Safety Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 33-44-101 to 33-44-111 (1979) (the Ski Act). She…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Davidson v. America Online, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Jeffries v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Woodman v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Joseph F. v. Sinclair Services Co.District Court, D. Utah · 2016
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.