Rorex v. Karcher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
The defendants in error have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that notice of appeal was not given as provided by law. The motion for a new trial was overruled on September 11, 1920, and the following entry made in the clerk’s minutes:
“This cause comes • on for hearing upon the motion of the plaintiff for new trial* Motion is overruled, to which plaintiff excepts, and exceptions allowed.”
On November 4, 1920, a journal entry was filed, reciting that on the 11th day of Sep tember, 1920, the motion for a new trial was overruled and notice of appeal was given in open court The defendants…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- First National Bank v. Coast Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Willan v. FarrarNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Harrison v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Willan v. FarrarNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.