Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Murray v. Carter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1934No. 25114PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This is a mandamus action brought on behalf of the state of Oklahoma ex rel, Wm. H. Murray, Governor, against Frank C. Carter, State Auditor of the state of Oklahoma, and Ray O. Weems, State Treasurer, to compel the defendants to allow and pay eight claims against the state, which have been set forth in eight separate causes of action.
The first seven of said claims and causes of action involved claims which were approved by the State Board of Public Affairs to be paid from account No. 15, fund No. 33, the same being an item of appropriation set forth in House Bill No. 240 of the Thirteenth…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Rouse v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bailey v. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Sibel v. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Crable v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Fuselier v. State Market CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Bailey v. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.