Legal Opinion

Haislip v. Southern Heritage Insurance

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 12, 1997No. Record 962214PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether Code § 38.2-2204 requires an insurance company, which had issued an automobile liability insurance policy, to provide full and separate coverage to its named insured who was allegedly guilty of negligent entrustment of a vehicle, even though the insurer had already paid the insurance policy limits on behalf of a permissive user who negligently operated the insured vehicle.

*267Michael F. Haislip filed a motion for judgment against Raymond L. Goode and Tina L. Price to recover damages he incurred as a result of an automobile accident. Haislip alleged that Price…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Watkins v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  4. Abbott v. WilleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. Weinberg v. GivenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Advanced Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. PRC Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Vaughn, Inc. v. BeckSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. SIGNAL Corp. v. Keane Federal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Infinity Insurance v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shelor Motor Co., Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API