Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Given

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 13, 1996No. Record 951975PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether Code § 8.01-401.1 permits a jury to consider, as substantive evidence, statements in periodicals which are deemed reliable and authoritative.

The plaintiff, Patricia G. Weinberg, consulted Dr. Fred T. Given, Jr., her gynecologist, because she had experienced dysfunctional menstrual bleeding. The plaintiff was described, at that time, as a healthy woman, 44 years old, who was not then smoking cigarettes. The defendant treated the plaintiff by prescribing a two-month supply of Ortho-Novum 1/50, an oral contraceptive, which stopped the bleeding. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Watkins v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  4. Turner v. SHELDON D. WEXLER, DPMSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. McMunn v. TatumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Henrico Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Halifax Corp. v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. SIGNAL Corp. v. Keane Federal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Davis v. Tazewell Place AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. Haislip v. Southern Heritage InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API