Legal Opinion

Groll v. Safeco Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1989No. 490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Safeco Life Insurance Company (“Safeco”) appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Mary Groll. On appeal, Safeco asserts that the incontestability provision in a group life insurance policy does not bar it from asserting the defense that the insured was ineligible for coverage under the policy. We disagree with Safeco’s argument; consequently, we affirm.

On November 1, 1982, Safeco Life Insurance Company (“Safeco”) issued a policy of group insurance to the Kaplan Company (“Kaplan”) on the lives of Kaplan’s regular full-time employees working a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Askew by Askew v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Crawford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Perilstein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Freed v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brosnan v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Halstead Consultants, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Baseheart v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API