Groll v. Safeco Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
Safeco Life Insurance Company (“Safeco”) appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Mary Groll. On appeal, Safeco asserts that the incontestability provision in a group life insurance policy does not bar it from asserting the defense that the insured was ineligible for coverage under the policy. We disagree with Safeco’s argument; consequently, we affirm.
On November 1, 1982, Safeco Life Insurance Company (“Safeco”) issued a policy of group insurance to the Kaplan Company (“Kaplan”) on the lives of Kaplan’s regular full-time employees working a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Askew by Askew v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Crawford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Perilstein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Freed v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brosnan v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Halstead Consultants, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Baseheart v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1997