Crawford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward
This appeal presents the question whether an incontestability clause contained in a group life insurance policy bars the insurer from defending against a claim on the ground that the insured was not an employee eligible for insurance under the terms of the policy. The question is one of first impression in this court.
The plaintiff, Harvey A. Crawford, brought an action in the circuit court of Rock Island County against the defendant, The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, to recover the sum of $10,000 as the beneficiary of his wife under a group insurance policy issued by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Powell v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Frances Krauss v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Skelton v. Druid City Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Home Life Insurance Company v. RegueiraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Shirley B. Suskind v. North American Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Jackson v. Continental Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.