Legal Opinion

Freed v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of Nebraska

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 27, 1974No. 56281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeGRAND, Justice.

This appeal presents for the first time the question whether an incontestability clause in a group life insurance policy bars the insurer from defending against a claim on the ground the decedent was not an employee eligible for insurance under the terms of the policy. The trial court held against the insurer, and we agree.

The matter arises on an application for adjudication of law points under rule 105, Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendant insurer concedes it is liable unless the incontestable clause is available as a defense. The trial court’s ruling is therefore final…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Crawford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. FlorenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Independence Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  2. Shirley B. Suskind v. North American Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Bonitz v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Leider v. FITZGERALD EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Groll v. Safeco Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API