Legal Opinion
Ziemba v. Johns
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1968No. 36945PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
The Director of Motor Vehicles revoked appellee’s license to operate a motor vehicle under the provisions of the Implied Consent Act. On appeal to the district court, that court found for the appellee, and the Director of Motor Vehicles has appealed.
The issue is whether a plea of guilty to a criminal charge of drunken driving under section 39-727, R. R. S. 1943, is sufficient to establish the reasonableness of a refusal to submit to a chemical test for alcohol in an administrative proceeding under the Implied Consent Act.
On December 4, 1966, appellee was arrested for operating a motor vehicle…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Marbut v. Motor Vehicle Department of Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Durfee v. RessNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Hazlett v. Motor Vehicle DepartmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nowell v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.