Legal Opinion

Gottschalk v. Sueppel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1966No. 51828PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

The commissioner of public safety has appealed from an order of the district court vacating the revocation for 120 days of plaintiff Gottsehalk’s driver’s license because of his refusal to submit to a chemical test under the Uniform Chemical Test for Intoxication Act, frequently called the Implied Consent Law, sections 37 through 50, chapter 114, Laws of the Sixtieth General Assembly.

The court’s decision is based on its conclusion plaintiff should have had the opportunity to consult with his attorney before exercising the option of consenting or refusing to submit to a chemical test under the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. ZuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Severson v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API