Legal Opinion

Tomashek v. Hartland Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The appellant, a duly incorporated town mutual fire insurance company, issued its policy to respondent June 1, 1929, insuring certain property of his against loss by fire for five years conditioned upon the insured complying with certain requirements. It will be necessary to consider here but one of these, for it is expressly stipulated that the respondent in all things complied with the requirements of the policy so as to be entitled to the insurance claimed by him, “unless the said policy at the time of said fire had lapsed because of the non-payment of an assessment.”

Appellant claims that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Breakstone v. Appleton Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Einerson v. Wisconsin Tornado Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bitters v. Central Mutual Hail & Cyclone InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API